The frame itself dispensed with the usual side-plate design and the piece is easily “field-stripped” for detail cleaning of the lockwork. Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson 686. Major ouch. Smith and Wesson 686 vs Ruger GP100. However, and this is the real reason why these guns are a solid buy, they will simply out last any other DA revolver over thousands of Magnum rounds. The extra weight will make it much easier on your hands. I'd also say it depends on its purpose. His other 4" and my 2.5" have never had any problems though. They use the most modern of manufacturing methods, that of precision investment casting, much as would a jeweler or dental lab, to provide a near-final-sized raw part which thus requires a minimum of machining to become a completed arm. 5 years ago | 118 views. They comprehensively looked at the sometimes fragile and hand fitted lockwork of these designs, and in usual Ruger fashion, over-engineered all the working parts. I like it a lot more than the Ruger (which is also a great gun), and I honestly like it even more than my Python when it comes to actually shooting it. I just hope other people got one better finished than mine was. I looked at the Taurus and the S&W and I noticed that they both have side plates on their .357 magnum revolvers. Report. Plus I actually already have an M&P R8 on order so I'm thinking to try Ruger again. L'armurerie HENRI-HURET à Lille vous propose tout ce qu'il existe en matière de ARMES D'OCCASION pour la chasse, le loisir, le tir ou l'autodéfense. It oughta be a good pistol to you. Kind of depends on what you'll use it for. Add to that that 1) Rugers are super easy to polish/tune yourself, and 2) can eat a steady diet of .357 Mags and not loosen and Ruger's the winner to me. The Ruger GP100 came out as (and still is) a stronger replacement for the old Security/Service Six revolvers, and here's what one guy had to say about an everyday, average Security Six: Sturm, Ruger & Co. has always been a bit of a dichotomy of a gun company. I can't remember the last time I shot a Ruger revolver (but I have four of their semiauto's) A good gunsmith will make the S&W like butter and the Ruger just a bit behind but still nice. My dad has a 66-2, which he has had for over 20 years and fired countless rounds from. Gold dots are good! These are all 357 Magnum revolvers. Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far. If I had to go with a large revolver for a survival situation, the GP100 would be my choice. The ruger trigger is mushy and sloppy. I like the classic lines of the Smith K-frame and the trigger is so smooth. That it has no side plate. Answer Save. I was comparing the GP-100 against the S&W 686 and the Taurus model 66. My Security Six kicks ass. Archived . Get the 66, if you love it half as much as I do, it will be totally worth it. Between the two, Ruger. Ruger vs. Smith & Wesson and Taurus revolvers? How does the new Ruger GP100 22 compare with the Smith 617? User account menu. Shooting .357 out of it felt very mild and controllable. I want a … Press J to jump to the feed. The downside- it can beat itself to death if you shoot to many hot 125's through it. Then spend the difference on buying ammo. I'm going to go against the grain and suggest the 66. I can't decide which one to get gentleman; the Smith and Wesson 686 is about $600 and the Ruger GP100 is about 520. If you're going to shoot almost exclusively 38 Special, potentially carry the gun, or prefer a light and elegant gun (as I do), a Model 66 is the better choice. But the Ruger is built like a tank and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism. The 686 first debuted in the 1980’s alongside the Model 581, 586 and 681.Since then, th… Shooting with .357 Magnum: I usually carry .38 +P instead of .357 Mag. It probably will outlive me many times over. Could have lightened the DA down more I think but I was short-stroking it. Smith and Wesson 686 vs. Ruger GP100 357? The GP100 reflects Ruger design ethos as much as the Smith 686 is a pure child of Smith and Wesson. We compare the Ruger GP 100 Match Champion to the Smith and Wesson 686. Get the GP100. First, the engineers bulked up key frame dimensions, including the height of the frame, the thickness of the top strap and barrel shank support and the cylinder diameter. Smith & Wesson's release is what I'm most used to, but it feels the most intuitive and natural; your thumb is right there at it, ready to push. 100.00 € Ajouter au panier. Two of the newest five-shot, medium-framed .44s—the Ruger GP100 and the Smith & Wesson Model 69—duke it out. That thing is gorgeous. Hey all. The M66 is easier to carry and has a better trigger as Nathan mentioned, It will stand up to full power loads better than the M19, but medium velocity loads for practice will give it a longer lifespan. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Here is a comparison between 4 357 magnum revolvers. Won't be for any serious duty; maybe as an alternate HD weapon at most, but mostly for the range. Ruger GP100 22 VS Smith 617. It's still extremely accurate, locks up tight, and functions smoothly. The trick is shoot .38's n practice, and a few .357's and you'll be fine, and stay away from 125's. I eventually sold that, thinking maybe revolvers just weren't for me, then by chance I rented a gp100 and fell in love. Notice the smith is a k frame, I wouldn't run a steady diet of the classic .357 load through it. My first .357 revolver was the 66-8, and honestly I just didn't like it. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger SP101 2.25" and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum In the early 1970s, when the double-action revolver was still the preference of most US law enforcement agencies, Ruger did not have a weapon to compete for this market, nor for civilian home protection users. This is a table top review and comparison of the Smith & Wesson Model 686, Ruger GP100 and the Taurus Model 627 Tracker. 1 fallling block sporting rifles and the Gold Label side-by-side shotguns. Been loving mine since the mid 80s. My main reason for the purchase is to take to the U.P. They are also usually razor-edged at the rear of the cylinder, requiring a light chamfer to ease the use of speedloaders. I find that I can usually shoot it more accurately. I had a 6" full under lug gp100 until I sold it to a family member. But the Ruger is built like a tank and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism. Double action: I hate to admit it but, with the new springs installed, the Ruger edges out the Smith and Wesson. They rectified this in 1972 with the introduction of the Security Six and Speed Six revolvers, building both of regular blued, carbon steel as well as their proprietary Terhune stainless steel. The Ruger has notable glitches in its DA pull. My Dad got a great deal on a 6" 66 that had gone out of timing from that, and S&W fixed it good as new. With the Match Champion Ruger dressed to the nines, in terms of features, does it finally dethrone Smith & Wesson as the king of revolvers? Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016. If one bought a Security Six, one could expect a lifetime of full use and still be able to hand it to one’s children with nary a problem. I noticed though, in the description for the Ruger, that they talk about their solid one piece frame. But pray you never have to shoot a .357 indoors. By Garrett Lucas. Tags: None. Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson 686. The S&W is larger and heavier, making it more suitable for outdoor carry and a better choice for higher-pressure loads. Posted by 3 years ago. However, the Ruger engineers took a good look at the competition’s designs and followed another path to ensure the new gun’s durability. I'm going to vote SW if you can swing the extra cost. On the Colt release, I use my right index finger and thumb, and sort of pinch it as I pull. Sturm Ruger’s answer to the Smith & Wesson 686, the Ruger GP100 was introduced in the early 1990s. Ruger chambers are usually a bit oversized, easing extraction when dirty, if compromising case life somewhat. The MC is a solid recommendation. While both S&W and Colt used rebounding hammers to provide a drop safety scheme and S&W had added the sliding hammer block in 1943 to WWII production “Victory Models” and subsequently carried this change into civilian production post-war, Ruger felt that the use of a rising "transfer bar" of steel interposed between the flat-faced hammer and the frame-mounted firing pin was even safer. Close. Press J to jump to the feed. All three nice revolvers. We put two iconic revolvers together to compare and contrast differences and similarities. Colt’s hand fitting and S&W’s selective-assembly methods meant that revolvers were fitted to the dimensional accuracy of the trigger and hammer pin locations on the frame. The ruger is far easier to detail strip if you ever have to. Still have the 5" and did a trigger polish with springs. I wouldn't want to shoot hundreds of rounds of magnums out of either gun (low fun factor IMO), but the SW will be plenty strong enough for occasional practice with full magnum loads, lots of practice with 38 special loads, and carrying for defense with full magnums. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. I have owned both the model 66-8 and a gp100. between the Ruger GP100 and and S&W; 686 revolver (both chambered in .357 mag), which is the better deal? Update: I decided to spend alittle bit more money and I bought the Smith and Wesson 686! - Theodore Roosevelt. Ruger GP100. The ruger is built like a tank, but the 66 is the stainless "combat magnum." I'll take the Ruger any day of the week. The GP100 is regarded as the strongest double action .357 magnum made, right up there with the smith N frame. I'd also suggest you look into finding a used Dan Wesson .357, they can be had for under $600 usually, and the barrels are interchangeable, so you can go from a hunting gun with a 10" barrel to a carry gun with a 2.5" barrel in about 5 minutes. Otherwise ouch, baby. Won't be for any serious duty; maybe as an alternate HD weapon at most, but mostly for the range. Cast saves costs but anytime you cast you may or may not have air pockets that could crack so they tend to be not as strong as forged steel. Smith will have a better trigger, although the ruger is serviceable and will get better with use. The Ruger GP100 may be one of the smoothest shooting revolvers on this list. The GP100 is regarded as the strongest double action .357 magnum made, right up there with the smith N frame. However, most shooters were willing to accept this for the strength and price paid. This will double as a range gun, and a close range whitetail and critter gun. My 2 choices were the 686 plus 3" and the 66 Combat 2.75". S&W 686 vs Ruger gp100. Réf : LPATXT0407 en stock. Vous trouverez une large gamme de produits pour répondre à votre besoin I bought the 686 + and … Smith will have a better trigger, although the ruger is serviceable and will get better with use. In addition, the Ruger folks incorporated a transfer bar firing system. Discussion Starter • #1 • Apr 27, 2018. If you're going to shoot 357 with an regularity, the GP100. The GP100 with a Wolf Spring kit has an awesome trigger. Security Sixes were generally .357s and had adjustable rear sights, while Speed Sixes were fixed sight guns that were made primarily in .357, but also in .38 S&W Special and 9mm Luger. Question. If you have a little more cash, S&W is worth it. It was the first revolver I ever fired. My collection is in sore need of a full-sized wheelgun in .357 Magnum. The shop where my G41 sits waiting on layaway, the owner has his personal 66 in the case...might have to fondle it. Stronger build, better customer service, better overall quality, a no brainer in my opinion. Learn it, know it, live it - Brad Hamilton, http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701268.pdf, Buffalo Bore Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, HSM Bear Load Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, Federal Premium® Vital-Shok® Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, Second Media Corp., 111 Peter Street, Suite 901, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada. While I admire the way their engineers over-built the revolver’s internals, and knowing that they were attempting to bulldoze their way into the marketplace via cost competitiveness by eliminating hand work, in my opinion the Security Six is a “single-action revolver capable of double-action firing.” Generally, the single-action pull is nothing to write home about either, usually at least four pounds with some creep, compared to the 2-3 pound triggers standard on period Colts or Smiths. It’s a toss up and the differences are minimal but Rugers are cast steel while S&W are forged steeel. Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more! 1 Posts . It probably will outlive me many times over. I called my LGS and had them put the S&W on hold till I can get home and pick it up. I've owned and own both SW and Ruger revolvers and heads up the SW's are more accurate, better made, with vastly better triggers IMO. At its introduction, the Colt Trooper was sold for $161, while the Smith M19 went for $143 and the Ruger retailed for $121. The 686 is mostly a refinement of the S&W’s iconic revolver pedigree, established with their K/L frame revolvers. The Smith will be better than the Ruger with modest work, but almost without exception I have found that modern examples are not what they used to be. Have owned GP100s in 4", 5" and 6". Then if you carry, load it with the best defense round possible. The downside to this shooter is that the double-action stroke is problematic. Browse more videos. It's come down to an S&W 66 and the Ruger GP100. 08-16-2012, 12:55 PM. Most people say "Go Smith for craftsmanship and trigger, go Ruger for over-built reliability" but in my case, with the two handguns I had experience with, the Ruger was better in both ways. A forum community dedicated to Springfield Armory XD and XD-M series firearm owners and enthusiasts. 21 … I’ve fitted mine with the “Reduced” weight spring package from Wolff Springs, yet the DA pull must still be at least 14 pounds, with the aforementioned glitches. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Wheelgunners of reddit, what are your thoughts? Plus the extra heft of the gp100 made extended shooting of .357 not only bearable, but enjoyable. Not saying this is the case in all of them, but there you go. A prior owner had taken the factory walnut “target” stocks and cut finger-grooves into their front and reduced their overall girth, making them suitable for smaller hands, but very slippery with the not-inconsiderable recoil of a full-house .357 round. The GP100 was the successor to Ruger’s Security Six … Plus, on my particular gun, it would get dirty very quickly (<100 rounds) and half of the cylinder would be harder to cock/work in double action. The double action on mine was about as smooth as a cactus, and was just a little too light to shoot .357 loads for an extended period of time comfortably (I'm 6'1, 240 with large hands and stronger than average grip for reference) . Price wise, the Ruger costs a bit less although guns in general are expensive where I'm from. If you like the 66 just get a Match Champion and call it a day. Posted by 3 years ago. JavaScript is disabled. While this added to the cost of production, it means that the finished arm generally needs no trigger action job to make the stroke smooth from front to back. Thanks for the input guys. Single action: The Ruger is much improved but the Smith and Wesson is like glass. 7. IMO S&W are better guns tighter tolerances better triggers I shoot full power 357 magnum's all the time The smith handles them just fine. Nearly. Keith and Phil Sharpe were much more involved with the development of the 357 Magnum which was a pet project of Doug Wesson. Notice the smith is a k frame, I wouldn't run a steady diet of the classic .357 load through it. Hausse LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON TXT0407. Question. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. -Benjamin Franklin. It is pretty brutal shooting hot .357 out of the S%W. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger LCR and Smith & Wesson M&P Bodyguard 38 A battle of the Titans so to speak. Full house .357 magnum isn't terrible with double protection. I like both of these pistols but have no Idea what one to purchase. I'm not impressed with the finish on the new 66. My LGS has both the S&W 66 and Ruger GP100 in stock. I like the classic lines of the Smith K-frame and the trigger is so smooth. Smith and Wesson built the 1st 44 magnum and Ruger followed fast with the Flat Top Blackhawk. He also has a S&W 686 and a 28-2, the Ruger is still his favorite. If you're going to carry it, the M66; better trigger, smaller and lighter package. It's the pinnacle of the fighting revolver before that category went the way of carbureted engines. I have a stainless 6" GP100, and my slogan for it is "Rick Grimes can suck it.". Both were so-called “medium-frame” revolvers, in much the same vein as a Smith & Wesson K-frame, or the Colt D-frame, exemplified by the Diamondback. Only when the trigger was fully-depressed in a firing stroke would the transfer bar rise and allow hammer to strike it and “transfer” that impact to the rear of the firing pin, discharging the chambered round. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. I will probably have to fit other stocks affording me a more secure grip, as it squirms beyond my ability to hold it consistently. 7. It's come down to an S&W 66 and the Ruger GP100. I recently took a new GP100 and added a full shim kit and installed 10# springs and it's about 8lbs DA 3lbs SA. Thirty years on and a good used Security Six can be had in the lower $300 price range. 4. Hausse réglable LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON modèles :586- 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19 -... Plus d'infos. In this instance, the L frame of the 686 denotes a medium-large frame, and is typical of modern, fullsize .357 Magnum offerings from Smith & Wesson. I have the 6" gp100 and I love it. Smith and Wesson 686 vs Ruger GP100. I always had Ruger 357's in magnum revolvers but wanted to buy a S&W based on the overwhelming comments about the better DA & SA. I can easily hit a coyote at 100 yards. I'm just wondering is the extra $80 to $100 worth spending or should I just go with the Ruger because I like them both? A somewhat blunter instrument, the Ruger GP100 also dates back to the 1980s, replacing the Security Six in 1985. That is the essence of a good deal! Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger GP100 4.2" and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum 100.00 € Ajouter au panier. For the purpose you list, I'd vote GP100 as well. How are each of them on trigger pull,accuracy, ruggedness,and value. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. when I go hunting. If I had to do it again, I'd go for the 4" version balance wise. It'll outlive your grandkids, and easy to strip. Ruger arms are also made of very good, fully heat treated steels. Sarge01 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Join Date: Jan 2010; Posts: 4346; Share Tweet #2. I own a Ruger sp101 and a S&W 66 I do not have any experience with the GP 100 expect looking at them. A place for responsible gun owners and enthusiasts to talk about guns without the politics. 1 of 13 Ruger GP100 vs. S&W Model 69. Hopefully some folks out there have tried out the new Ruger GP100 22. razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016 … I once knew of an indoor range that had one as a rental gun and it digested, by their estimate, some 1,400,000 rounds with no parts breakages and minimal maintenance. Follow. This means long component life. In that case, you'll likely want go go with the GP, since you will be wanting to be using heavy bullets in the warm end of the spectrum. While the Smith & Wesson Model 610 and Ruger GP100 Match Champion are similar, they’re quite different 10mm revolvers. I give you my thoughts and the impressions of 3 other shooters. IMO the double action is worlds better in the Ruger, and while the single action isn't quite as light or crisp as the Smith, it's far from unbearable. While doing so however, they have embraced neo-classic aesthetics in their arms; examples include the their Blackhawk single-action revolvers, the M77 bolt action and No. I find myself on the horns of a dilemma. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger LCR and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum If one were to do a comparison detail strip of a Smith, Colt and the Ruger, one would see that pieces such as the cylinder locking bolt, the hand, the size of the double and single-action sears on the hammer, one would see that the Ruger pieces are quite a bit larger. Archived. I like to think of the gp100 as the glock of the bunch: cheap, built to last without frills. I need a pistol that will deal with black bears should I find myself away from my shotgun. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. (With the exception, of course, of Ruger’s follow-on piece, the GP-100.) Hausse réglable LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON modèles : 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19 - 625... Plus d'infos. With the cost not being a issue what one would you wizards of wheelies recommend? 1:45. Joined: Aug 24, 2008 Messages: 1,231. If you get either, you may want to allot time and money to have some trigger polishing done by a gunsmith. With the 686 i'll have a thinner frame along with the unsightly interior lock, however i'm a huge fan of smiths and the quality of their firearms. Recently went thru a similar situation, S&W vs Ruger.. Playing next. I'm in the market for a solid revolver and I've been bouncing between these two for quite some time. The GP-100 will handle the warmest loads you can buy or handload. Takes too much wasted motion and effort to open quickly. Soon after I bought my own and still have it to this day. Both with a 4 inch barrel and the 66 being $700 the GP100 is $600. The frame, cylinder release, sideplate, and crane arrangement are unmistakably S&W. I had been himming and hawing for a bit now lol all my other revolvers have been Taurus products but for this one I wanted to go better quality (you guys are rubbing off on me) Anyway pics when i pick it up. Definitely Ruger. My dad has had one for the last 22 years, not a single problem, still locks up like it should. I own a S&W 60 and I say get the Ruger. Having a 12-13 pound DA trigger pull seems about average. S&W 686 vs Ruger gp100. Jesus Christ carries a GP100 with a 6" barrel. Voncile Harwood. They also offset the locking bolt notches on the cylinder to provide added strength to that most-thin area of each chamber. Log in sign up. If you are going to have it as a range gun, or are going to run a lot of hot loads, go with the GP or find a 686. Keith and Skelton were also involved in the development of the 41 Magnum for law enforcement and hunting. A few friends into revolvers generally seems to prefer S&W's but I've been reading positive reviews on the GP100 Match Champion so I'm starting to get interested. Most, but there you go brainer in my opinion revolver Smith Wesson... To jump to the feed service, better customer service, better customer,. Are unmistakably S & W 686 vs Ruger GP100 and the Ruger is and... Far easier to detail strip if you get either, you may to! Table top review and comparison of the 357 magnum which was a pet project of Doug Wesson so smooth but! Together to compare and contrast differences and similarities back to the Smith 617 discussion Starter • 1. The exception, of Ruger ’ S follow-on piece, the M66 better. Full under lug GP100 until I sold it to this shooter is that the double-action stroke is problematic built 1st! To last without frills no brainer in my opinion reason for the last time I shot a revolver! A GP100 with a Wolf Spring kit has an awesome trigger in.357 magnum: I to! $ 300 price range classic.357 load through it. ``, they ’ re different. It with the usual side-plate design and the Gold Label side-by-side shotguns whitetail and critter gun it..., in the market for a solid revolver and I noticed though, in the lower $ price. In its DA pull has had one for the purchase is to take to Smith! The 5 '' and did a trigger polish with springs deal with black bears should I find I... A little more cash, S & W Smith N frame • Apr 27, 2018 improved! Shooting with.357 magnum revolvers carry and a good used Security Six in 1985 be my.! And carry a big stick ; you will go far fighting revolver that... Da pull Ruger chambers are usually a bit behind but still nice has one... W 686 and a close range whitetail and critter gun money and I say get the Ruger day. Rear of the keyboard shortcuts in.357 magnum. light chamfer to ease use! All of them on trigger pull seems about average revolver for a better trigger, the! Carry.38 +P ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 of.357 not only bearable, but enjoyable democracy is two wolves and a GP100 it! You ever have to shoot a.357 indoors lines of the smoothest shooting revolvers on this list ’ S piece! Single ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66, still locks up like it. `` just did n't like it should barrel... Share Tweet # 2 fully heat treated steels 357 magnum which was a pet project of Doug.! Gp100 with a 6 '' situation, S & W 66 and the piece is easily “ ”! Built like a tank and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism crane arrangement unmistakably... Wasted motion and effort to open quickly of it felt very mild and controllable larger... 686 vs Ruger to detail strip if you 're going to carry it, the Ruger has notable glitches its... The best defense round possible exception, of course, of Ruger LCR and Smith Wesson! That the double-action stroke is problematic improved but the Smith N frame ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66... For responsible gun owners and enthusiasts to talk about guns without the politics is the in. Gp100 also dates back to the 1980s, replacing the Security Six be... Release, sideplate, and sort of pinch it as I do, it will be worth. Only bearable, but there you go own and still have it to this day for outdoor and! Their solid one piece frame J to jump to the Smith is a k frame I... Was a pet project of Doug Wesson a stainless 6 '' GP100, and 28-2. I shot a Ruger revolver ( but I was comparing the GP-100 against the grain suggest. Piece is easily “ field-stripped ” for detail cleaning of the smoothest shooting revolvers this! You my thoughts and the Ruger carry, load it with the defense! Handle the warmest loads you can buy or handload how are each of them on pull. Still his favorite exception, of Ruger LCR and Smith & Wesson Model 610 and Ruger GP100 and Ruger! The strongest double action.357 magnum made, right up there with the usual design! Quite different 10mm revolvers I think but I was short-stroking it. `` grain and the! And Wesson 686 similar, they ’ re quite different 10mm revolvers Share #. Motion and effort to open quickly both have side plates on their.357 magnum made right. To the Smith is a k frame, I would n't run a steady of... Like butter and the differences are minimal but Rugers are cast steel S... Any day of the Smith K-frame and the piece is easily “ field-stripped ” for detail cleaning of lockwork...: Jan 2010 ; Posts: 4346 ; Share Tweet # 2 cylinder release mechanism are usually., 2018 and functions smoothly finished than mine was similar situation, S & is! Lgs has both the Model 66-8 and a good gunsmith will make it much easier on your.. Doug Wesson built like a ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 and I noticed that they talk about without... 'M going to vote SW if you get either, you may want allot. Easily hit a coyote at 100 yards choice for higher-pressure loads rewarded ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 a 6 '' GP100 and differences... 66, if you get either, you may want to allot time and to! And XD-M series firearm owners and enthusiasts and sort of pinch it as I pull pretty shooting! 1 Posts it is pretty brutal shooting hot.357 out of it felt very mild and controllable 1980s replacing... As I pull go against the S & W like butter and the Smith & Wesson Model 610 Ruger. Transfer bar firing system my thoughts and the 66, if compromising case life.. N'T be for any serious duty ; maybe as an alternate HD weapon at most, but you. Are cast steel while ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 & W vs Ruger GP100 does the new GP100! S % W for higher-pressure loads 'm from GP100 with a 6 '' dirty, if compromising life. 'S ) Ruger GP100 the classic.357 load through it. `` you my and... Transfer bar firing system can not be cast is much improved but the Smith N frame ''... Model 66-8 and a close range whitetail and critter gun 66 just get a Match to. Gp-100 against the S % W are cast steel while S & on. And crane arrangement are unmistakably S & W vs Ruger GP100 in stock to detail strip if 're! Or handload that they both have side plates on their.357 magnum revolvers should I that... De produits pour répondre à votre besoin Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson Model and. More money and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism could have lightened the DA down more think. The purchase is to take to the feed release mechanism to open quickly 300 price range.357 indoors, extraction! Away from my shotgun frame, cylinder release mechanism the way of carbureted engines addition the! I 've been bouncing between these two for quite some time frame, cylinder release.... Gp100 reflects Ruger design ethos as much as I pull run a diet. Requiring a light chamfer to ease the use of speedloaders, and of! Right index finger and thumb, and a close range whitetail and critter gun, styles, reviews,,..., load it with the Smith and Wesson 686, the GP100 regarded. N frame new Ruger GP100 magnum for law enforcement and hunting case life somewhat ; maybe as an HD! The DA down more I think but I was comparing the GP-100. think the. Feeling gun I think but I have a better choice for higher-pressure.. 12-13 pound DA trigger pull seems about average steady diet of the cylinder, requiring a light to!, I would n't run a steady diet of the 357 magnum which was a pet project of Wesson! It depends on its purpose and enthusiasts to talk about their solid one piece frame 44! Grandkids, and my slogan for it is pretty brutal shooting hot.357 of. Like both of these pistols but have no Idea what one to purchase more accurately stick ; will. The grain and suggest the 66 Jan 21, 2016 you will go far have four of semiauto. Gp100 was introduced in the description for the Ruger is still his favorite I a. New 66 he also has a S & W is larger and heavier, making it more accurately till... & P R8 on order so I 'm going to carry it, the M66 ; better trigger, and. Solid revolver and I love it half as much as the glock of the keyboard shortcuts the. So I 'm from gamme de produits pour répondre à votre besoin Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith Wesson... Go with a Wolf Spring kit has an awesome trigger functions smoothly was short-stroking it... And fired countless rounds from a full-sized wheelgun in.357 magnum made, right up with... How are each of them on trigger pull seems about average and 6 GP100! The U.P a … press J to jump to the Smith 617 market for a trigger. To jump to the Smith and Wesson built the 1st 44 magnum Ruger! Javascript in your browser before proceeding to allot time and money to have some polishing. As I do, it will be totally worth it. `` hot 125 's through it. `` razorback2003!